From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 06:48:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2349516A4CE; Thu, 13 May 2004 06:48:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6DB43D2D; Thu, 13 May 2004 06:48:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4DDmvgd045189; Thu, 13 May 2004 06:48:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3/Submit) id i4DDmucg045188; Thu, 13 May 2004 06:48:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 06:48:56 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <20040513064856.B42908@xorpc.icir.org> References: <40A3393F.1391943E@kuzbass.ru> <20040513012344.A12373@xorpc.icir.org> <40A34082.F0182B31@kuzbass.ru> <20040513013717.A16394@xorpc.icir.org> <40A345F9.1460F5C4@kuzbass.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <40A345F9.1460F5C4@kuzbass.ru>; from eugen@kuzbass.ru on Thu, May 13, 2004 at 05:55:05PM +0800 cc: ipfw@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw: reset tcp X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:48:58 -0000 On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 05:55:05PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: ... > > removing the M_SKIP_FIREWALL would let ipfw process the > > packet too. HOWEVER: i think it is a bug in the general case > > to reprocess internally-generated packet, because you would rely > > on a correct ipfw configuration to avoid loops (which might not > > be the case). > > > > I have no idea how ipfw1 used to do (and i am not goin to check!) > > but i don't think the generated packet did reenter the firewall. > > I use ipfw2. > > Please make it possible (using sysctl or any other mean) to > disable M_SKIP_FIREWALL for such packets (I suppose 'unreach' rules > are affected too). I DO need to process ALL outgoing packets. > For exapmle, I must use 'ipfw fwd' (to implement policy routing) > for the packets with source IP like this. ok the situation is the following: 1.- unreach rules send packets through send_reject() which in turn calls icmp_error() which in turn goes through the firewall; This is safe because ipfw2 will not generate an ICMP reject in response to an ICMP packets so loops are avoided; 2.- all other firewall-generated TCP packets (rst and keepalives) go through send_pkt() and then bypass the firewall. The only way we could safely go through the firewall again is to make sure that we never send a RST in response to a RST (need to add an additional check in O_REJECT). Give me a few days (i.e. ping me again on monday!) to come up with a safe patch to do this, which does not rely on the programmer to DTRT and avoid loops. cheers luigi