From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 18 16:56:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.force9.co.uk [195.166.136.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8146B154AD for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 16:56:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (keep.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.8]) by awfulhak.org (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA73785; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:51:39 GMT (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA02876; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:50:59 GMT (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199903190050.AAA02876@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Terry Glanfield Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SKIP and NAT, I got it. In-reply-to: Your message of "18 Mar 1999 22:52:46 GMT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:50:59 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > brian@Awfulhak.org (Brian Somers) writes: > > I've never used skip, but I would imagine that it should reduce the > > interface mtu by ~128 bytes so that it has room to encapsulate the > > data (does skip encrypt too ? If so, it'll probably need a few > > bytes more than 128). > > > > Is this happening ? > > Yep. 134 bytes. What happens if you HUP natd after SKIP has tweaked the MTU ? In theory, the MTU change should be noticed by natd (assuming you're using -dynamic), but if it's not, the HUP should make it look again. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message