From nobody Sat Aug 30 07:14:23 2025 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cDRG80cyYz666VN for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 07:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R12" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cDRG76M9Mz3r7r for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 07:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1756538063; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dMZAVzi+20qp8AKfIXmGLztmHE+OGzaTJ4iC/iOdk/Y=; b=lqhbLTd7bG9Fn8vwv5PXWCmdTvNMnR7q8Gr6vI5ZhHaVnHPVqbNaVVuvLLgNiioZ0CYG5e 73QBjLOwE5fMmjGa/wZMEQiDwZS0j+2KWWYVa5VIew31Q0l2jwmW+TYj2XP+T2pBP6G0Ax PKZWT80tlNZDcZoAbHrvJ2gTxDQg0hadGBY/+OTQTbWqfox2TcpYz+d+ErskBQWz3XKUzb XkwgeZZ+u0yZgJIjizD2BI94W/e+DmYGriKk2eFfdN1bRizq1jDHJkXbTKPthvIdXzskyS 5f8wTVKdOjWvLlDj8qS1g+VAEUe7s/IdcbAtpi7cBP0aTaJFb1G5IFG7OkfefA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1756538063; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dMZAVzi+20qp8AKfIXmGLztmHE+OGzaTJ4iC/iOdk/Y=; b=pCcTAGzjeA+OBqFuZHVHc+/ku/2Ucumy39Gyw4lwfJUAD62Y7HR/kO3zvCc9eLZxSS2hjx JDrkhoSxTpaVcRyHrh4nC0J2TVJRqF13M++n8glbhLFCd9KKqP4tu1M1GJFbIaJDb7rFgf KA6/KqgUfDB9aAZ5SHVqQhmhJ5qm6yUzIEKvuS2Yx5ostQMHYicxIjU1fpjFdwefhI1Y7D DHk2sg0ZbnqVY4Eior/YFbZyqMfwbGmeJwaRAs1UhI9td/NIUs3dV5IFsY0YDMKugFtdJP U//iAUWLV0Z475CuRo0A8IrKj2yt3eNsr9RRc0aZRWwsjttisvyNZf0l/ADSaw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1756538063; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rgeR0Kz1NL+v6sMmyBgHYNjumI84+Zz1xuGWFVHc35YUWKr1pgIeMlgoomLeUnfjrF680N lgFWINNPNTta6UqYh+8P2RF5iveTiazh/oKwl3jtseLnek5QNpuAHCSnMvN5w4ajpK821a UekYlyb1Hgnw6CuTiKIbjk037HoQ7vOHAqCmlhh4yScjfvM4A8SXWlHKVd/rgEQmZ6M9UM 5kEXM0MHa9DsaoiWaUagW+2sqLhbEXfO20gEwtVghBomRyfZsUoBF5+F4+6TDgI+T7XV+E HNLeyR+/dQEgQDz/T+w14Z8nbSpjwA8dO4Bbqe5CLlXf/b2Fwrgh0d3e17ri+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cDRG75lHrz1lR for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 07:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 57U7EN6g070470 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 07:14:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 57U7ENkl070469 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2025 07:14:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 289142] sysutils/vm-bhyve: public bridge fails on 15-CURRENT unless net.link.bridge.member_ifaddrs=1 is set Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 07:14:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: hpaluch@seznam.cz X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D289142 --- Comment #6 from Henryk Paluch --- (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #5) I fully agree with your opinion but FreeBSD core team (and Linux Proxmox te= am) think otherwise. Main benefit of having DHCP IP assigned to NIC instead of bridge is that we= can manage vm-bhyve's bridges remotely without need of local console, because: 1. system normally boots with DHCP assigned address on NIC - remote access works 2. vm-bhyve init scripts (creates and connects its bridges if configured) 3. we can remotely connect to machine after boot and create new "public" sw= itch without IP and connect it to NIC. But when IP is assigned to Bridge we have kind of chicken and egg problem: 1. booting system where NIC is up but without IP address - only local conso= le working 2. we have to use local console to run vm-bhyve commands to create switch w= ith IP 3. only after point 2 - remote access will again start working (once devd r= ules are fixed). The only way to avoid this chicken and egg problem is to define these brid= ges (with IP address) system wide ("external" to vm-bhyve), but this reduces usefulness of existing vm-bhyve framework. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=