Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:56:29 -0700 From: Mark Peek <mp@freebsd.org> To: rgrimes@freebsd.org Cc: Mark Peek <mp@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r331510 - in head: share/man/man4 sys/conf sys/dev/vmware/vmci sys/modules/vmware sys/modules/vmware/vmci Message-ID: <CAGGgMJcJfBPPYc96JZ9vTVgjnn75raf1gjWxqYGmJhfKim6pfQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201803250127.w2P1R59o038861@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <201803250057.w2P0v0lA081039@repo.freebsd.org> <201803250127.w2P1R59o038861@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Rodney W. Grimes < freebsd@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > Author: mp > > Date: Sun Mar 25 00:57:00 2018 > > New Revision: 331510 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331510 > > These files do not each contain a usable copyright, though > they seem to contain SPDX tags that indiate they should contain > a BSD 2 clause copyright. IANAL but I believe you meant "...they should contain a BSD 2 clause *license*". The files should contain a valid copyright. The intent of my commit and the author were to use the implied SPDX version of the licenses without burdening the source code with the more heavyweight license text. Having seen SPDX in the src tree, I believed the SPDX-License-Identifier was sufficient. But, to your point, I'm not sure I have seen a discussion or a decision on it. Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGGgMJcJfBPPYc96JZ9vTVgjnn75raf1gjWxqYGmJhfKim6pfQ>