From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 23:31:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B6F16A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 23:31:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A6E43D1F for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 23:31:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avleeuwen@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so59857rnz for ; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:31:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=cZE9zvDIC+AE9F0ag8szwom0MTKpl67tGLLuo+ph09ItHEBlIhKGEF58VI1yiti6HjujVSnIHHZyOL9hpkUBKN/Tp/AAt36Ds4aSAzMroQNZGx6n2b2wnT+uD39Oywk4maRuXpJH2z7IuiJqxnAbB/NeMl2ZAHmiGeAoQTQ1i0Y= Received: by 10.38.8.40 with SMTP id 40mr1580760rnh; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:31:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.206.16 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:31:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 00:31:00 +0100 From: Arjan Van Leeuwen To: Jeff Behl In-Reply-To: <41B4CCFA.6070202@fastclick.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41B4CCFA.6070202@fastclick.com> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reproducible kernel panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Arjan Van Leeuwen List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:31:02 -0000 On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:19:54 -0800, Jeff Behl wrote: > I'm getting a kernel panic every time I start getting traffic (~ 20Mb/s > total) to two squid processes. This was not happening with -RELEASE. I > upgraded on the advice that STABLE would decrease the %cpu spent in > system, which was much higher than that spent in user. The machine's > only fucntion is as a reverse proxy (2 separate squid processes to take > advante of both cpus). > > Let me know if a dump would be helpful, or if there's anything I can do > to help. > > Dual AMD Opteron system.. > > Jeff > ps. I don't believe the problem is with a zebra/ospfd kernel > interaction. the open port RST responses are expected; i can explain > why if it would provide insight into the problem... > I had a panic that looked a lot like this (panic in swi, came up when I had some network traffic), and it's also been reported by other people than me. Turning of SACK seems to work for most people (at least it worked for me). Put net.inet.tcp.sack.enable=0 in /etc/sysctl.conf. Arjan