Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:06:03 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsnmpd & 64bits counters problem Message-ID: <4947EE0B.9050902@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20081216181850.O74416@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <4947D7A9.2050407@FreeBSD.org> <20081216181850.O74416@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>
> SM>Hello.
> SM>
> SM>Some weird thing has happened with 64bit counters:
> SM>
> SM>% snmpwalk -v2c -cpublic localhost ifInOctets
> SM>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.1 = Counter32: 4107815474
> SM>...
> SM>IF-MIB::ifInOctets.16 = Counter32: 2894713654
> SM>
> SM>% snmpwalk -v2c -cpublic localhost ifHCInOctets
> SM>IF-MIB::ifHCInOctets.1 = Counter64: 7911064279758
> SM>...
> SM>IF-MIB::ifHCInOctets.4 = Counter64: 13143091216588
> SM>
> SM>There are all 16 32bits counters but only 4 64bits. That's less than physical
> SM>interfaces on this router (em0-em5).
> SM>
> SM>7.1-PRERELEASE
>
> The highspeed counters are only there if this is a high-speed interface.
> High speed means that the baudrate in the interface MIB (the one in the
> kernel) must be larger than 20Mbaud.
Well, these is lagg interfaces:
lagg0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 9000
options=19b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4>
ether 00:30:48:67:d4:68
media: Ethernet autoselect
status: active
laggproto lacp
laggport: em2 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
laggport: em0 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
There is no baudrate on them. But they are really high-speed however.
--
Dixi.
Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4947EE0B.9050902>