From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 29 00:45:04 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA14723 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:45:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA14693 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:45:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA02394; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:43:15 +0100 (CET) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Julian Elischer , Greg Lehey , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:24:39 PST." <7032.917598279@zippy.cdrom.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:43:14 +0100 Message-ID: <2392.917599394@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <7032.917598279@zippy.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >Many of us refuse to follow style(9), will NEVER follow style(9), >and to insist on it for others would be hypocritical at best. Bruce >is more of a microcosm and shouldn't be taken as indicative of general >trends. :) ... Unless we're talking about modifications to existing files where either style(9) or other systematic styles apply, in which case we should all try to adapt our changes to that style to avoid babelized codelayout. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message