From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 16 23: 0:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [206.29.169.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CC437B405 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 23:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tedm.placo.com (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [206.29.168.154]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f9H605T22387; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 23:00:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Mikkel C. Simonsen" , Cc: Subject: RE: WanIC 405 _IS_ End of Life -- what are the (netgraph) based alternatives?? Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 23:00:05 -0700 Message-ID: <001701c156d0$f7e12bc0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <3BCB2A91.1CA3@post5.tele.dk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Mikkel C. >Simonsen >Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:27 AM >To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG >Cc: soren@soekris.com >Subject: Re: WanIC 405 _IS_ End of Life -- what are the (netgraph) based >alternatives?? > > >> Hi Everybody, >> >> I've been following the sync serial board discussion a little, and it >> seems like that there's no source for inexpensive sync serial boards >> with FreeBSD, or boards with documentation to make a driver, or from >> companies with a good policy towards open source and/or FreeBSD.... >> >> The only one close seems to be the cronyx, they seems to have full >> source code, but their boards is not easily available in the US, or >> available with T1 interfaces. > >I have also found Sangoma (http://www.sangoma.com/products.htm) - does >anybody have good/bad experienves with their boards? > Um - are their drivers Netgraph-enabled? > >Are you considdering boards with v.35 interface for those that don't >need an internal CSU/DSU? > Hope so - I hate internal DSU/CSU's. Ted Mittelstaedt tedm@toybox.placo.com Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide Book website: http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message