From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 8 06:08:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1151065670 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 06:08:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276568FC17 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 06:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 164F65C24 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:20:22 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4EE0539E.3030406@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:05:18 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <4EDEB600.9000102@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4EDF4703.1050705@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4EDF5253.5060201@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20111207114756.48295690@mikmeyer-vm-fedora> <4EDFE933.3060708@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4EDFE9BD.9020105@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4EDFE9BD.9020105@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [SOLVED]Re: 64bit build errors - use gcc46 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 06:08:01 -0000 On 12/08/11 08:33, Da Rock wrote: > On 12/08/11 08:31, Da Rock wrote: >> On 12/08/11 05:47, Mike Meyer wrote: >>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 12:17:57 +0000 >>> Tom Evans wrote: >>>> The way I understand it is that they use compiler/assembler features >>>> that did not exist in the version of binutils that is in base. >>> Which begs the question - why isn't the new version of the tools >>> (provided by ports) listed in BUILDDEPENDS in the port, then? >>> >> I'm not building the port. This is my own build, so the builddepends >> isn't existent. > Hence hackers@, else I would have posted ports@ Just to let the list know, I changed as - ./configure --as=/usr/local/bin/as. I still had the exact same error oddly enough. I then had to install gcc46; and the error changed. I then had to update the configure script to comment out the v4l videodev headers (weird). Bingo! I had success. So, it begs the question did the as option change things? Or does gcc46 imply the use of it anyway? I'll have to try again without the option to see for sure, but for now I have another project that I need to keep the status quo for.