Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:17:24 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213658] [PATCH] lang/lua53: Take MAINTAINER'ship, Add bug fix patches Message-ID: <bug-213658-13-TXJmPtFjGM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-213658-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-213658-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213658 --- Comment #2 from Guilherme Salazar <gmesalazar@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1) > @Guilherme Should these bug fixes be merged to the quarterly branch for t= hose users? As this is bugfix-only, that'd be good. > Additionally, the version of the port needs to be modified/incremented in= some manner.=20 > While we could 'just' increment PORTREVISION, it's probably worth using D= ISTVERSION to=20 > append some .X, -X, -pX or similar suffix. > Is there an official version format in use upstream for these we can use?= I note the URL's=20 > for each of bug 1-4 link to "5.3.3-4". Could we use a plain "5.3.3.4" ? There really isn't until they make for a new release; releases are numbered x.y.z, where x.y is the version and .z the release, where releases for the same x.y version = are bug fixes. For this reason, I'm not sure it's a good idea to append a suffix apart from what PORTREVISION already appends (_x, right?). > Please also confirm that the changes pass QA (portlint, poudriere) if pos= sible. For more=20 > details see: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-ha= ndbook/testing.html Just ran portlint and it looks fine. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-213658-13-TXJmPtFjGM>