From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 21:15:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99AD16A4D0 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:15:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub2.midco.net (mailhub2.midco.net [24.220.0.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C13D43D39 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:15:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pmes@bis.midco.net) Received: (qmail 19197 invoked by uid 0); 27 Feb 2004 06:15:14 -0000 Received: from host-195-219-220-24.midco.net (HELO bis.midco.net) ([24.220.219.195]) (envelope-sender ) by lvs-pop.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Feb 2004 06:15:14 -0000 Message-ID: <403ED260.1060707@bis.midco.net> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:15:12 -0600 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <200402251000.i1PA0nGn056196@repoman.freebsd.org> <403E0B90.9040106@bis.midco.net> <20040226203351.GB5915@xor.obsecurity.org> <403EA170.9080100@bis.midco.net> <20040227015101.GA10403@xor.obsecurity.org> <403EAF98.7080009@bis.midco.net> <20040227031312.GA11697@xor.obsecurity.org> <403EB9C5.3020108@bis.midco.net> <20040227033527.GA12083@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040227033527.GA12083@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: jkoshy@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/xaos Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 05:15:15 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:30:13PM -0600, Peter Schultz wrote: > >>Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >>>Many ports do not correctly use PTHREAD_{CFLAGS,LIBS}, but that's no >>>reason to add another incorrect one. >>> >>>Kris >> >>Where is this correctly outlined? What I'm finding is wildly varying. > > > In my email :-) > > Kris This ? CONFIGURE_ENV= CFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include ${PTHREAD_CFLAGS}" \ LDFLAGS="-L${LOCALBASE}/lib ${PTHREAD_LIBS}" Pete...