From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Dec 10 20:13:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7F24B5498 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CsQ8J4GH1z3C1K for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 925CC4B5497; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9226A4B5496 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CsQ8J3hgjz3Bpr for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 719CE1E876 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0BAKD43C086429 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0BAKD4jI086428 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251716] devel/tkcvs: move to devel/tkrcs && update to 9.4.0 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:13:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251716 --- Comment #5 from Chris Hutchinson --- (In reply to daniel.engberg.lists from comment #4) I'm sorry. I should have really waited to finish my coffee before making my last reply -- I know better :-( More accurately; I saw an apparent need for a name change for this port, as it continued to gain additional RCS support; now up to CVS, GIT, RCS and SVN. TkCVS no longer seemed to cut it. I gave it some thought, and decided that TkRCS really seemed to hit the target. I made/tested the changes required to make the change, and found all was well. Before submitting a patch upstream. I decided I should really take the time to remove the cruft I discovered while making my initial changes. This turned into a rabbit hole, which took much longer than I imagined, as there was clearly quite a bit of (bad) copy/past(ing), as well as platform dependent nonsense that crept in. After completion, I whipped up a diff, and sent it along for consideration. She indicated had no issue with a name change, and that's where it stands. As to "bogus" version; This is the version I chose, and also a part of the patch I submitted upstream. I picked the number, as it provided enough "points" to cover potential updates to TkCVS. Thanks for your continued time, and effort with this. --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=