From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 26 06:47:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED52F37B401 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 06:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.132.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80AB443F3F for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 06:47:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nunotex@pt-quorum.com) Received: (qmail 20566 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2003 13:47:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO atum.ip.pt) (195.23.132.2) by lontra.ip.pt with SMTP; 26 Apr 2003 13:47:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 9979 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2003 13:47:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gw.tex.bogus) ([195.23.213.131]) (envelope-sender ) by atum.ip.pt (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 26 Apr 2003 13:47:24 -0000 Received: by gw.tex.bogus (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 780FB41EA; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:47:02 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:47:02 +0000 From: Nuno Teixeira To: Dung Patrick Message-ID: <20030426144701.GA5900@gw.tex.bogus> References: <1051362553.c8e66a40dkt@digitalme.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1051362553.c8e66a40dkt@digitalme.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my experience with the SCHED_ULE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 13:47:29 -0000 On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:09:13PM +0800, Dung Patrick wrote: > Hi, > > My PC is an PIII SMP. I have been using the SCHED_4BSD (with ADAPTIVE_MUTEX) with 5-Current for some time. Now I have tried the SCHED_ULE (with ADAPTIVE_MUTEX). > > I have tried some real world applications like Mozilla, xmms, and run inside KDE. The performance is about the same with SCHED_4BSD. But I could notice a little bit slow down/delay when I switch to another process. For example: use the mouse to press the menu bar of konsole and drag it. I could see a small delay before the window moves. > > Finally, I would appreicate all the developers for their time and effort on freebsd. > > Regards, > Patrick > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi, A few days ago I tried too SCHED_ULE sheduler and the first thing that I noticed is that when I run my PII 300 at high load (cvs, compiling programs, mozilla, etc) my mouse fails a lot its precision. I recompile the same kernel with old sheduler and it fixed mouse problem. Bye, Nuno Teixeira -- /* PGP fingerprint: C6D1 06ED EB54 A99C 6B14 6732 0A5D 810D 727D F6C6 */