From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 10:43:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13ACC16A469 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-20-82.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.20.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D1D13C484 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5FAhUm1001803; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:43:30 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l5FAhT9V001802; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:43:29 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:43:29 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Ivan Voras Message-ID: <20070615104329.GF1173@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AqsLC8rIMeq19msA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VLANs and routing X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:37 -0000 --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2007-Jun-14 01:55:20 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: >But the (somewhat weird) requirements are that the vlan interface on >machine1 shouldn't have assigned IP address, but the second one should. =2E.. >Is this kind of setup even supported? I don't see how it could be if machine1 is an IP endpoint: In order to transmit a packet, it needs to put a source IP address into the packet - which virtually always comes from the interface. --=20 Peter Jeremy --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGcm1R/opHv/APuIcRAozTAJ43EK6euK6f+iZg1XjUXoEQylQLigCeOIco yi9qJ6BCDc88b6yzruQscRg= =HbKv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--