From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 26 10:43:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA13103 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 26 May 1998 10:43:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA13094 for ; Tue, 26 May 1998 10:43:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA11445; Tue, 26 May 1998 17:43:35 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id TAA16225; Tue, 26 May 1998 19:43:34 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980526194334.44185@follo.net> Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 19:43:34 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: "John S. Dyson" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fix for undefined "__error" and discussion of shared object versioning References: <356a9f0a.251653824@mail.cetlink.net> <199805261659.LAA19904@dyson.iquest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <199805261659.LAA19904@dyson.iquest.net>; from John S. Dyson on Tue, May 26, 1998 at 11:59:52AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, May 26, 1998 at 11:59:52AM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > I really don't think that we would want to also get into compiler > support issues. Tool support issues are complex enough. I can imagine > that egcs (could) be stable enough for our c++ compiler, but am much > less confident of it being our default c compiler. Personally I'd prefer to use TenDRA if at all possible. It seems to be much better than GCC when you look at error control etc. Besides, it has the license we've got as a goal to have overall (ie, a BSD-style license :-) Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message