From owner-freebsd-java Tue Sep 29 15:25:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA23504 for freebsd-java-outgoing; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA23497 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 15:25:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA14458; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 16:25:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA27630; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 16:25:25 -0600 Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 16:25:25 -0600 Message-Id: <199809292225.QAA27630@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: alk@pobox.com Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: JDK1.1.7 binaries for Solaris and Winxx are available In-Reply-To: <13841.17652.433644.372344@avalon.east> References: <199809290458.VAA05333@rah.star-gate.com> <13841.17652.433644.372344@avalon.east> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > : So now the question is when is Sun going to make the sources to > : jdk 1.1.7 available... > > As usual: http://java.sun.com/nav/business/license_dl.html. Mine was sent in earlier today. :) > I'm sure this is a real pain for Nate, but strictly speaking > I think he should be checking that the cvs users are all licensed > for the current version, each time you update the repository. I haven't been so far... > Certainly this license is different that previous licenses in > some minor particulars, and Sun specifically requires a new > agreement. (See http://java.sun.com/nav/business/source.html.) Actually, I just checked, and the license is the same. (Cause I sent in the old license, and it's the same as the previous license, which is the same as the all 1.1 licenses.) I also spoke with some some licensees, and they were only required to sign the one license, and haven't been asked to continually sign licenses. That being said, if you all wouldn't mind it would be 'safer' if you submitted a new license agreement. It also means that you can get the sources earlier and start porting before I get it into the CVS tree. :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message