Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:25:58 -0700
From:      David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
To:        John Capo <jc@irbs.com>
Cc:        tom@uniserve.com (Tom Samplonius), freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com (freebsd-current)
Subject:   Re: mb_map full with GATEWAY and maxusers 64! 
Message-ID:  <199506262226.PAA17617@corbin.Root.COM>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Jun 95 15:35:36 EDT." <199506261935.PAA12035@irbs.irbs.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I agree with Tom here.  But, it seems to me that there is an
>underlying problem of some sort.  Why do I have to allow for 4Megs
>of mbuf clusters to service some unknown transient event.  Once
>this memory is in the mbuf map, its there forever.

   Well, the usage is a function of the number of TCP connections. If you do a
"netstat" and find a whole pile of connections (even ones in a closing state),
then this explains it. This can easily happen to people using HTTP.

>Is this a valid way to examine a running kernel?  It appears that
>it is.

   I suppose, but "netstat -m" should provide you with enough information.

-DG



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506262226.PAA17617>