From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Feb 12 11:11:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from onizuka.vmunix.org (onizuka.vmunix.org [194.221.152.19]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A9F3FAF; Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:11:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (1346 bytes) by onizuka.vmunix.org via sendmail with stdio (sender: ) (ident using unix) id for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2000 20:11:11 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: From: torstenb@vmunix.org (Torsten Blum) Subject: Re: zsh re-org In-Reply-To: <20000212135128.C11463@shadow.blackdawn.com> from Will Andrews at "Feb 12, 2000 01:51:28 pm" To: andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM (Will Andrews) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 20:11:11 +0100 (CET) Cc: shige@FreeBSD.ORG (Shigeyuki Fukushima), torstenb@vmunix.org, billf@chc-chimes.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Will Andrews wrote: > I understand people's wish to have a stable zsh, but I will not tolerate > incompetent maintainers. Be careful what you say. > I know you'll do the job the way it's supposed > to be done. Bill, if possible, just change maintainer so shige can do > the job.. He won't. I don't agree and approve that. Btw: *plonk* -tb -- OSI ist nicht deswegen tot, weil es nicht vernünftig war, sondern weil sein Mitbewerb praxisnäher ist. Man könnte sagen, das ist der Sieg des ingenieur- mäßigen Designs über das akademische Design. -- Helge Oldach über den OSI Protokollstack in To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message