Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Feb 2000 20:11:11 +0100 (CET)
From:      torstenb@vmunix.org (Torsten Blum)
To:        andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM (Will Andrews)
Cc:        shige@FreeBSD.ORG (Shigeyuki Fukushima), torstenb@vmunix.org, billf@chc-chimes.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu
Subject:   Re: zsh re-org
Message-ID:  <m12Jhwl-000OSPC@onizuka.vmunix.org>
In-Reply-To: <20000212135128.C11463@shadow.blackdawn.com> from Will Andrews at "Feb 12, 2000 01:51:28 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will Andrews wrote:

> I understand people's wish to have a stable zsh, but I will not tolerate
> incompetent maintainers.

Be careful what you say.

> I know you'll do the job the way it's supposed
> to be done. Bill, if possible, just change maintainer so shige can do 
> the job..

He won't. I don't agree and approve that. 

Btw: *plonk*

 -tb
-- 
OSI ist nicht deswegen tot, weil es nicht vernünftig war, sondern weil sein
Mitbewerb praxisnäher ist. Man könnte sagen, das ist der Sieg des ingenieur-
mäßigen Designs über das akademische Design.
    -- Helge Oldach über den OSI Protokollstack in <FoxLn3.u6q@sep.hamburg.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m12Jhwl-000OSPC>