From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 16 04:40:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E49616A401 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (ip30.gte215.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com [209.20.215.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FE343D46 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:40:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2G4eqF1034391; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:40:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <4418EC55.9010301@highperformance.net> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:40:53 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060306061938.GB14604@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060306061938.GB14604@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Xn Nooby , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a "stable" ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:40:58 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:24:08PM -0500, Xn Nooby wrote: >> Is there a "stable" ports tree? > > No. However you can sup the ports tree for a specific release. I run ports using "tag=RELEASE_6_0_0". The reason I do this is that I find it to be much less work. I am a much more conservative user than many. I really hate chasing down down upgrade dependencies even with the the very nice ports tools we have today. If you really wanted a particular port to be updgraded, you can fetch just that one port and build it. This would give you a manually controlled psuedo-stable. It would be more work though. Later, Jason C. Wells