From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 19 18:16:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F28E1065685 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outF.internet-mail-service.net (outf.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CADA8FC17 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593782446; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326F62D605C; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48AB0E12.8030607@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:16:50 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Maste References: <200808181754.18812.max@love2party.net> <20080818162411.GA77460@sandvine.com> <48A9BFED.604@elischer.org> <48A9C1B0.5010805@elischer.org> <20080819152607.GA44331@sandvine.com> In-Reply-To: <20080819152607.GA44331@sandvine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Acquiring a mtx after an sx lock X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:16:43 -0000 Ed Maste wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:38:40AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > >>> Ed Maste wrote: >>>> Ahh, it seems ups' commit of rmlocks changed the "You have: sx_lock, >>>> You want: Slp_mtx" case from no to ok (in r173444). >> Ignore me.. I was reading the table backwards.. of course if you have >> an sx you can still take out a mutex, but not visa versa. > > Yep, and ups' r173444 change didn't affect this at all, it just > corrected the table. > > If I don't hear otherwise I'll merge the changes to the table to 7 > sometime soon: > > You have: You want: Spin_mtx Slp_mtx sx_lock rw_lock sleep > - SPIN mutex ok no no no no-3 > + SPIN mutex ok-1 no no no no-3 > Sleep mutex ok ok-1 no ok no-3 > - sx_lock ok no ok-2 no ok-4 > + sx_lock ok ok ok-2 ok ok-4 > rw_lock ok ok no ok-2 no-3 > > Have SPIN / want SPIN adds the "Recursion is defined per lock" footnote. > > Have sx / want Slp & have sx / want rw change from no to ok. I agree > > - Ed > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"