From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 14:14:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1534616A4CE for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 14:14:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C78343D2D for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 14:14:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailnull@mips.inka.de) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (dsl-082-082-077-003.arcor-ip.net [82.82.77.3]) by mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF4D12A8B for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 15:14:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBJEE3LN095180 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 15:14:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mailnull@kemoauc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBJEE2pV095179 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 15:14:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mailnull) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 14:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20041218233405.62765.qmail@web50302.mail.yahoo.com> Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: eliminating GPL apps on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 14:14:06 -0000 Jorge Mario G. wrote: > I was about to send this same list > also there is a BSD awk You mean Brian Kernighan's awk. FreeBSD already uses that. (When talking about changing FreeBSD, please look at -CURRENT or at least 5.x, not 4.x.) > the OpenBSD dudes are working on OpenCVS That's still under construction and not in production use anywhere. > 2. why not import OpenNTPD? it works too OpenNTPD only supports a tiny subset of the features of Mills ntpd. While the idea behind OpenNTPD is to be good enough for the large majority of people, you can't just treat it as a replacement. It also doesn't deal well with local clock drift yet. (Yes, I think FreeBSD will eventually want to adopt OpenNTPD and return Mills ntpd to ports for those few time keeping maniacs who need it, but I'm not sure I want to advocate that at this point in time.) -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de