From owner-cvs-all Mon May 18 16:26:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA07740 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 18 May 1998 16:26:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hwcn.org (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA07682; Mon, 18 May 1998 16:26:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by hwcn.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA13652; Mon, 18 May 1998 19:20:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 19:20:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Julian Elischer cc: Bruce Evans , guido@FreeBSD.ORG, jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_input.c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Mon, 18 May 1998, Julian Elischer wrote: > > [The change was from `(foo & BAR && ...' to (((foo & BAR) != 0) && ...'.] > > there may not have been a bug but it's a hell of a lot easier to read.. I suspect this might make an interesting study for some young neuroscientist. I swear the non-paranthesized version is a lot easier to read (rough estimate says it took me thrice as long to read the paren'd version), and you'd have a difficult time convincing me that it is due to you having more Lisp experience or something like that... -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message