Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 18:13:47 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 212530] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: Revive port Message-ID: <bug-212530-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212530 Bug ID: 212530 Summary: x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: Revive port Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Keywords: patch Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: lightside@gmx.com Created attachment 174587 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D174587&action= =3Dedit Proposed patch (since 187097 revision) Patch to revive x11-wm/fluxbox-devel port (except infrastructure changes). The x11-wm/fluxbox-devel port was removed in ports r187729 and merged into x11-wm/fluxbox port with following request: "Request by: too many to list (include developers)" In process of creation of bug 211814, I attached my (personal) version of x11-wm/fluxbox-devel port to show it for current maintainer of x11-wm/fluxb= ox port or people who may read the PR. The maintainer suggested to create sepa= rate PR for it in bug 211814 comment 11. I didn't change the MAINTAINER section, but it may be changed to ports@, if mezz@ is not active. The difference between current x11-wm/fluxbox (ports r421576) and x11-wm/fluxbox-devel ports is usage of different (sed) patches and other description for pkg-descr file, based on information from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluxbox page. Also I didn't add XINERAMA to OPTIONS_DEFAULT. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-212530-13>