From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jun 16 12:47:08 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA14877 for current-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 12:47:08 -0700 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA14869 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 12:47:03 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA05651; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 12:46:34 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199506161946.MAA05651@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: DES, crypt and eBones To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 12:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Cc: mark@grondar.za, FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.Org In-Reply-To: <199506161937.VAA14966@grumble.grondar.za> from "Mark Murray" at Jun 16, 95 09:37:52 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1819 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.Org Precedence: bulk > > > telnet[d] with kerberization should go in eBones, since eBones was > > to replace the kerberization stuff supplied by 4.4BSD lite. Garrett > > had some grand plan here, but has dropped the ball when the eBones > > stuff was done (Not his fault, this was taken over by some one else > > who has been unavaliable to maintain it). > > So I take that going ahead and moving this (telnet[d]) will not be > considered a hostile action? ;-) (I won't do any committing for a > while - just till I get the feel of it). I think between you, Garrett and myself we can come up with something that is workable. > BTW - was the other person by any chance Geoff Rehmet? I have chatted > to him on the phone and emailed him (A while back). You're right - > he's busy! Yes, it was Geoff, I couldn't pull the name off the top of my head and was too lazy to go look it up. > > > > Binary sets should match source sets, otherwise you are heading for > > > > trouble :-(. > > > > > > I'd buy this if there was not so much crosstalk between the packages. > > > Solutions? One possible one is to move libraries to secure? (yuk) > > > > I need a better picture in my head of just what is going on in there > > right now. I have not looked at that part of the tree since it was > > changed from the original 4.4 lite code and am not so sure that the > > initial change was a good idea at all... > > You preferred the actual Kerberos? I know someone in Britain who has a 4.4 > CDROM with this on and I could do a replacement job... Except that Kerberos is not exportable, so this would screw us up. If it was that simple I could reserect them from the CVS Attic area! -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD