From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Mar 27 18:32:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6782737B6B7; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 18:32:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AB4FE1C5D; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 21:32:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 21:32:07 -0500 From: Bill Fumerola To: Claude Tardif Cc: Mark Ovens , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no ports work anymore Message-ID: <20000327213207.E23367@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <20000327235956.E233@parish> <38DFF040.3CD7CD92@cam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <38DFF040.3CD7CD92@cam.org>; from intmktg@CAM.ORG on Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 06:35:28PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 06:35:28PM -0500, Claude Tardif wrote: > Yes, but doesn't it make more sense to download the base directory which is same as my release? Problem is, > if I do specify tag=. for ports-base, I am asked to do a fresh make world or get a port upgrade kit. > Considering I have made world already, only yesterday, does that mean I need to make world AFTER > downloading the ports? Considering I'm on a 486, does simply making buildworld do the same (that would save > me alot of time)? For the umpteenith time: PORTS ARE NOT BRANCHED. There is no RELENG_3 of ports-base. There is a RELENG_3_0_RELEASE or however the hell they're tagged (http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi or `cvs log' for the answer). You are asking cvsup for something that does not exist. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect Computer Horizons Corp - CVM e-mail: billf@chc-chimes.com / billf@FreeBSD.org Office: 800-252-2421 x128 / Cell: 248-761-7272 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message