From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 30 02:33:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EB516A4DA; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771C143D45; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:33:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7U2XfSX056962; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:33:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k7U2Xa08056961; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:33:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:33:36 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" Message-ID: <20060830023336.GA56931@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20060826212120.GA66604@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060829175022.1a3ac0f6@serene.no-ip.org> <20060829230447.GA59838@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060829202916.04dc8cd1@serene.no-ip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060829202916.04dc8cd1@serene.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Alexander Kabaev , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:33:46 -0000 On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:29:16PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:04:47 -0700, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:50:22PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > > > > Incidentally, I've been wondering for the longest time now: is/are > > > there any particular reason(s) why we exclude gcj from the gcc > > > tree/build? Sure would be a cool thing to have. > > > > > > > 1) It's not needed to build anything in the base system. > > 2) It takes a long time to build. > > 3) You really want to use the gcc41 or gcc42 port. > > > > Of course, IMHO. > > I've tried both ports, but gcj fails to run, complaining about a > missing "spec" file (I forget the exact filename, maybe > "gcjlib.spec" or something similar). :-( > > Is this maybe an arch-specific (amd64) problem? Or? > Contact Gerald. He is fairly quick at addressing port issues. I don't build the ports because I build GCC svn sources for 4.1.x and trunk several times a week. I'll note that I don't normally build gjc. I can try a bootstrap tomorrow. -- Steve