From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 28 00:55:01 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E570137B401; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 00:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B508F43F85; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 00:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru)
Received: from mail by mx.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19WAfh-00057F-00; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:02:57 +0700
Received: from iclub.nsu.ru ([193.124.215.97] ident=root)
	by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19WAfZ-0004vu-00; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:02:50 +0700
Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (fjoe@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by iclub.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5S7sDMk075406;
	Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:54:13 +0700 (NSS)
	(envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru)
Received: (from fjoe@localhost)
	by iclub.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5S7sC90075405;
	Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:54:12 +0700 (NSS)
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:54:12 +0700
From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Message-ID: <20030628075412.GD74123@iclub.nsu.ru>
References: <20030625232045.GB92939@iclub.nsu.ru>
	<Pine.BSF.4.21.0306251624010.3793-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0306251624010.3793-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Envelope-To: julian@elischer.org,
 demon@freebsd.org,
 freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000001, version=0.13.6.3
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-106.5 required=5.0
	tests=BOGOFILTER_TEST_PASS,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT,USER_IN_WHITELIST
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
cc: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Jailed sysvipc implementation.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 07:55:02 -0000

hi, there!

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:24:29PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:

> > btw I know of two projects whose goal is IP stack virtualization for jail.
> > Virtual IP stack (as well as virtualized sysvipc with separate
> > memory zones) can be quite useful. Can provide two solutions?
> > 
> > - with shared memory zone (for those who want "light" version)
> > - with separate memory zones (for people who want to keep
> > sysvipc fully separated, i.e. one user can't exhaust all sysvipc resources
> > and make sysvipc unusable for second user)
> 
> Is either of these projects Marco Zec's project?

yes. The other is Riccardo Scandariato work. Both were discussed on -net
about a month ago.

/fjoe