From owner-freebsd-sparc Fri Mar 31 6:27:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from euromail1.genrad.com (x37.genrad.co.uk [195.99.3.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D7637B5A2 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 06:27:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from swindellsr@genrad.co.uk) Received: from CDP437 (cdp437.uk.genrad.com [132.223.131.31]) by euromail1.genrad.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id H9RQSFGF; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:27:22 +0100 From: Robert Swindells To: kdulzo@gerp.org Cc: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <20000330205209.A90031@mobile.gerp.org> (kdulzo@mobile.gerp.org) Subject: Re: Hello Reply-To: rjs@fdy2.demon.co.uk Message-Id: <20000331142723.00D7637B5A2@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 06:27:23 -0800 (PST) Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >FreeBSD's libc would seem to be the choice in my book, but are >there not syscall issues between the NetBSD and FreeBSD kernel? The alpha libc has a switch to allow it to be compiled using the NetBSD syscall definitions. I would try to do something similar so that you can run the FreeBSD userland on a NetBSD/sparc system. Robert Swindells To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message