From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 21:58:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E681D1065747 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C218FC14 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.30.101.53] ([209.117.142.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5LLsI0j082440 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:54:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <932DB8CA-22DA-495F-89AC-F547146780B6@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:54:09 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <15B76B64-D26E-420D-AE37-B52A694CDF98@gmail.com> <8E65FA9C-330B-4055-8959-75EE06E557E8@gmail.com> <932DB8CA-22DA-495F-89AC-F547146780B6@gmail.com> To: Damjan Marion X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:54:20 -0600 (MDT) Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cross-compiling for arm with clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:58:42 -0000 On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Damjan Marion wrote: >=20 > On Jun 21, 2011, at 7:06 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >> On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:12 AM, Damjan Marion wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:16 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> How it normally works is that we build a compiler that invokes the = right as, ld, etc for the architecture in question. Clang is clearly = broken here in assuming that as can cope with anything other than native = assembler :) We normally either build gcc that knows where to find = these files. In the buildworld case, this is communicate with weird = paths and shell variables. With the whole 'xdev' series of targets = (which are instructive to look at), we build into a specific location = /usr/freebsd-xdev-arm/bin, etc). >>>>=20 >>>> It works by accident for i386 on amd64, I think. as treats the = more or less as the same. >>>=20 >>> I submitted a patch[1] to clang mailer which invokes = xxx-yyy-zzz-as/ld based on -ccc-host-triple. Patch is copy of netbsd = code which is already in clang. >>>=20 >>> For me it works well, even when I use clang on Darwin host, it calls = proper as/ld. >>>=20 >>> # /opt/llvm/bin/clang -ccc-host-triple arm-unknown-freebsd = -mfloat-abi=3Dsoft test.c -o test -v -c >>> clang version 3.0 (http://llvm.org/git/clang.git = 98138cdfdee05c0afbab2b209ce8cfe4a52474e1) >>> Target: arm-unknown-freebsd >>> Thread model: posix >>> [snip] >>> End of search list. >>> "/opt/llvm/bin/arm-unknown-freebsd-as" -o test = /var/folders/kb/kbDaYaFqFQaCg3mXbTLH5U+16gE/-Tmp-/cc-RMHOwf.s >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Is this what we need to support cross-compiling freebsd with clang? >>=20 >> As we do it today? No. Today we build the binaries as 'as' which = are part of the buildworld. These binaries aren't called = arm-unknown-freebsd-as, but instead 'as'. >>=20 >> Do we want to switch? Maybe. >=20 > Seems that clang will first try to run as/ld which is in the same = directory like clang. That is exactly what we have in /usr/obj/.../bin = so seems that buildworld should work out of the box. >=20 > Problem with ARM is that clang is not build as part of cross-tools, so = clang from /usr/bin is called instead which also means that as/ld from = /usr/bin are used. >=20 > --- share/mk/bsd.own.mk (revision 223366) > +++ share/mk/bsd.own.mk (working copy) > @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ > __T=3D${MACHINE_ARCH} > .endif > # Clang is only for x86 and 32-bit powerpc right now, by default. > -.if ${__T} =3D=3D "amd64" || ${__T} =3D=3D "i386" || ${__T} =3D=3D = "powerpc" > +.if ${__T} =3D=3D "amd64" || ${__T} =3D=3D "i386" || ${__T} =3D=3D = "powerpc" || ${__T} =3D=3D "arm" > __DEFAULT_YES_OPTIONS+=3DCLANG > .else Well, you'd need to add to the comment too :) I'm not sure it is time to make this the default. Adding -DWITH_CLANG = to the cross build would also accomplish the same thing. The reason we = don't yet build arm is that it hasn't been very well tested... > Unfortunately this doesn't mean that cross-compiling works fine now = for ARM. It fails on building lib/libcompiler_rt. > Here is output if anybody have idea how to fix it: = http://pastebin.com/Ly2jARjd Not sure how to fix that. Warner=