From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 27 17:36:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2865FF2E; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: from keltia.net (aran.keltia.net [88.191.250.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3192711; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lonrach.local (foret.keltia.net [78.232.116.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: roberto) by keltia.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 418D252AE; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:36:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:35:59 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: dinoex@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security/openssl speed issues Message-ID: <20130827173559.GB25401@lonrach.local> References: <20130827153205.GA48196@roberto02-aw.eurocontrol.fr> <20130827161454.GL29777@funkthat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130827161454.GL29777@funkthat.com> X-Operating-System: MacOS X / MBP 4,1 - FreeBSD 8.0 / T3500-E5520 Nehalem User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:36:03 -0000 According to John-Mark Gurney: > As far as I can tell, 1.0.1e doesn't properly detect AES-NI and uses > these instructions when present, and cryptodev usage doesn't work, and > doesn't warn when it fails... > > My own program that tests cryptodev out performs openssl because of > this.. Yeah, that seems the second issue, the first one being that even with aesni/cryptodev out of the picture, 1.0.1 is still slower than 0.9.8... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr In memoriam to Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/