From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 16 21:42:16 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D411E16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:42:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from upipe0.schmolie.com (upipe0.schmolie.com [207.109.186.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 848EE43D45
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:42:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: (qmail 91955 invoked by uid 2525); 16 Sep 2004 21:42:15 -0000
Received: from 82.76.1.117 ( [82.76.1.117])
	as user itetcu@localhost by webmail.people.tecnik93.com with HTTP;
	Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:42:15 -0700
Message-ID: <1095370935.414a08b7a6ce5@webmail.people.tecnik93.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:42:15 -0700
From: itetcu@people.tecnik93.com
To: current@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1
X-Originating-IP: 82.76.1.117
cc: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: BETA4 + IPFIREWALL_FORWARD => panic
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:42:17 -0000


Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote

>itetcu@people.tecnik93.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> [Please excuse formating, I'm writeing from webmail]
> 
> A 5.3-BETA4 cvsupped around 16.00 today (16 sept) panics when ipfw fwd rule is 
> used. It seems to be stable with the same kernel without fwd rules. If the fwd 
> rule is present at boot it will panic each time, it it is added later it seems 
> that sometimes (one of 5 untill now) it does not panic. The panic seems to 
> happen on the first / first few fwd packets.

[...]

> I have MFC'd the fix a couple of hours ago.  You should cvsup again and check 
if you have got rev. 1.1.2.5 of netinet/ip_fw_pfil.c.

Thanks. Yes, I've seen the commit about 15 minutes ago and I'm rebuilding kernel 
now. Usually I would have seen it faster in my email, but since I'm not in my 
office I had to check the web archive for cvs-src.


Thanks again and sorry for the noise,
IOnut