From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 26 07:15:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E107B37B404 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 07:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dsl093-019-250.msp1.dsl.speakeasy.net (dsl093-019-250.msp1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.19.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1E8743F85 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@jocose.org) Received: (qmail 30941 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2003 14:15:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jocose.org) (10.0.0.194) by 0 with SMTP; 26 Apr 2003 14:15:28 -0000 Message-ID: <3EAA9475.5080402@jocose.org> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:15:17 -0500 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030424 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nuno Teixeira References: <1051362553.c8e66a40dkt@digitalme.com> <20030426144701.GA5900@gw.tex.bogus> In-Reply-To: <20030426144701.GA5900@gw.tex.bogus> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Dung Patrick cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my experience with the SCHED_ULE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:15:31 -0000 Nuno Teixeira wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 09:09:13PM +0800, Dung Patrick wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>My PC is an PIII SMP. I have been using the SCHED_4BSD (with ADAPTIVE_MUTEX) with 5-Current for some time. Now I have tried the SCHED_ULE (with ADAPTIVE_MUTEX). >> >>I have tried some real world applications like Mozilla, xmms, and run inside KDE. The performance is about the same with SCHED_4BSD. But I could notice a little bit slow down/delay when I switch to another process. For example: use the mouse to press the menu bar of konsole and drag it. I could see a small delay before the window moves. >> >>Finally, I would appreicate all the developers for their time and effort on freebsd. >> >>Regards, >>Patrick >> > > Hi, > > A few days ago I tried too SCHED_ULE sheduler and the first thing that I > noticed is that when I run my PII 300 at high load (cvs, compiling > programs, mozilla, etc) my mouse fails a lot its precision. I recompile > the same kernel with old sheduler and it fixed mouse problem. > > Bye, > > Nuno Teixeira > I have been using ULE since it was introduced and have noticed a performance increase over the past week or so. This is on a dual PII 350 configuration. Pete...