From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 19 05:27:56 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704FC16A418 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:27:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp224.math.arizona.edu (smtp224.math.arizona.edu [128.196.224.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3C413C47E for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:27:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp224.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IikPM-0003kA-Fb for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:28:42 -0700 Received: from 71-220-158-135.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.158.135] helo=.domain.actdsltmp) by smtp224.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1IikPM-0003k2-AL for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:28:28 -0700 Message-ID: <47184047.40503@math.arizona.edu> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:27:35 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <1192767877.39526.41.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> <47183FD7.3020706@math.arizona.edu> In-Reply-To: <47183FD7.3020706@math.arizona.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACL-Warn: The HELO/EHLO greeting .domain.actdsltmp is invalid X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) Cc: Subject: Re: best way to run vista inside freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:27:56 -0000 Predrag Punosevac wrote: > Frank Jahnke wrote: >>> I have heard that Win4BSD is really good. >>> >> >> Your hearing is not good. Win4BSD is a terrible product when compared >> with the very old version of VMware. Its only advantage is that you can >> run it with more than one CPU (namely, APIC is enabled). Win4BSD is >> less stable, less responsive, and it appears to be dead as far as >> activity goes. FWIW, in my opinion qemu/kqemu is not particularly good, >> either. >> >> VMs in general are a problem on Free. There is an effort to port the >> most recent VMware Workstation by a very good man. I do hope this >> works, because right now things in the VM world on FreeBSD truly are >> bleak. >> >> Frank >> > I said in the disclaimer that I personally do not run any Windows > natively or via WMware. > I was also wrong about the price. It looks it is $29.99 > http://www.win4bsd.com/content/ > Sorry for spam, this is the end of my participation on this thread. > >