From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jul 11 11: 7:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BBE37B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:07:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls2.std.com [199.172.62.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7504743E31 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:07:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cambria@world.std.com) Received: from world.std.com (dp@world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15364 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:07:37 -0400 Received: (from cambria@localhost) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA09735 for net@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:07:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:07:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael C Cambria Message-Id: <200207111807.OAA09735@world.std.com> To: net@freebsd.org Subject: xl checksum and dsniff Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I've been using dsniff on 4.6-Stable (and earlier) for a while. I've setup a faster machine to run this in the lab. This machine however has an built-in xl interface. Things don't work. The 'old' machine on the same hub works just fine. Its using vx0. My guess is that doing hw checksum by the nic could be the issue. This is the only real difference I can see at present. Any ideas? Thanks, MikeC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message