From owner-cvs-all Mon Nov 8 11:18:29 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19FC15268; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 11:18:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA89722; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 12:18:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA11868; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 12:17:43 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199911081917.MAA11868@harmony.village.org> To: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssh - Imported sources Cc: Brian Feldman , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Nov 1999 11:04:52 PST." References: Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 12:17:43 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk In message Kris Kennaway writes: : Even if the person who puts it there doesn't live in the bay area (as : Brian doesn't, according to his ICBMnet coordinates)? This isn't the : impression I got from Jordan when I asked (it would constitute a big, : obvious exit strategy from the crypto regulations if everyone could just : upload their code to a "haven" server in San Francisco). The act of exporting the code happens in the bay area. The US is a free country, so far as freedom of movement is concerned. The fact that someone sent it to SF first isn't relevant, imho. If brian were to drive to SF and put a package in the mail there, it would be legal, so why would substituting a scp blah freefall: for the drive to SF change that? If this isn't the case, the powers that be for the freebsd server might want to make it explicitly clear. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message