Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:12:01 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jlh@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postfix options no honored by poudriere Message-ID: <20151016081201.GH19913@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <CAGSa5y0v5F9nzXpSphbd81e6Q0HYU2uoJh=RzR3xkvWu0oVu1w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGSa5y2w4-7LwKsytMfGtGVoE_HEYz7Hf8ikp3_o81S2cGGF2A@mail.gmail.com> <20151016075657.GG19913@home.opsec.eu> <CAGSa5y0v5F9nzXpSphbd81e6Q0HYU2uoJh=RzR3xkvWu0oVu1w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!
> > Port options are normally saved in /var/db/ports/,
> > and poudriere takes the default values or those
> > found in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/.
[...]
> > So, how is your setup for the options configured ?
>
> I'm using make.conf -style configuration.
Ok, can you show the section for postfix from make.conf ?
> I haven't followed closely
> the development of Poudriere, but I suspect this is the old way,
> although according to the manpage it's still supported.
I also assume it's still supported.
> I'm not sure about what you're saying for /var/db/ports. This
> directly is used by the ports tree; in my experience Poudriere uses a
> separate tree for each { jail, set }.
Yes, that's why I described my use case.
I use the ports tree to test if a port builds at all and to
configure the options and then use poudriere to check the build on
the relevant plattforms.
--
pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151016081201.GH19913>