From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 16 08:12:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFA8A16A08 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CA65133; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn07N-000LsW-TG; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:12:01 +0200 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:12:01 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Jeremie Le Hen Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postfix options no honored by poudriere Message-ID: <20151016081201.GH19913@home.opsec.eu> References: <20151016075657.GG19913@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:12:02 -0000 Hi! > > Port options are normally saved in /var/db/ports/, > > and poudriere takes the default values or those > > found in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/. [...] > > So, how is your setup for the options configured ? > > I'm using make.conf -style configuration. Ok, can you show the section for postfix from make.conf ? > I haven't followed closely > the development of Poudriere, but I suspect this is the old way, > although according to the manpage it's still supported. I also assume it's still supported. > I'm not sure about what you're saying for /var/db/ports. This > directly is used by the ports tree; in my experience Poudriere uses a > separate tree for each { jail, set }. Yes, that's why I described my use case. I use the ports tree to test if a port builds at all and to configure the options and then use poudriere to check the build on the relevant plattforms. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !