From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 2 10: 7: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8656514FA1; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost (billf@localhost) by jade.chc-chimes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA11857; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:08:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:08:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Warner Losh Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mentioning RFC numbers in /etc/services In-Reply-To: <199908021650.KAA06933@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > I say that I don't care if it allows this. In fact, I want to be able > to do things like that... Copying the telnet line and changing the first word to 'http' does wonders for being to access machines from inside a school district's firewall. Choosing ports by number would be nice, however the same objections Matt had with changing our API ring some buzzers in my head too, however the evil side of me says "screw whoever is porting inetd, we like functionality. The evil side normally wins. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message