From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Aug  8 17:05:06 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C632ABB261A
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon,  8 Aug 2016 17:05:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B53F01E4D
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  8 Aug 2016 17:05:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u78H56gG075805
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:05:06 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 211361] suggested boot partition size is too small, bsdinstall
 creates unaligned partitions
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:05:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: misc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, performance
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-211361-8-TxSOA9X8pg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-211361-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-211361-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:05:06 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211361

--- Comment #13 from Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Dag-Erling Sm=C3=83=C2=B8rgrav from comment #12)

It wraps zfs, zpool, and newfs. It does talk directly to GEOM (through libg=
eom)
-- but so does the gpart command-line tool. The point is just that all
partitioning tools and disk setup tools should have the same default behavi=
ors.
If we don't like those defaults, we should change them. And, since we contr=
ol
the whole operating system, we can! Why should we work around bad defaults =
in
the system in one particular piece of software that people use exactly once=
 per
installed system, but leave the normal tools they use repeatedly set up in a
way that can give bad performance?

If this is a real problem, we should fix it across the board. Hacking up the
installer is not the right solution.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=