From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Apr 24 14:31:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA05428 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:31:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA05289 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:30:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA03964; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:29:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199804242129.OAA03964@rah.star-gate.com> To: Frank Pawlak cc: jcwells@u.washington.edu, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, hasty@rah.star-gate.com Subject: Re: Andreessen: Linux use growing In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 24 Apr 1998 16:10:39 CDT." <199804242110.QAA02784@darkstar.connect.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3961.893453391.1@rah.star-gate.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 14:29:51 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I think is high time that we start complaining to Netscape about the development status of the netscap browsers for freebsd . Specially since we have a very stable distribution compared to linux which leads me to believe that they are bias towards linux and if we can't manage to break the chain we will always be delegated to second status because *we* don't take the steps to be known. Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message