From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 13 9:54: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cactus.fi.uba.ar (cactus.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B37837B407 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 09:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cactus.fi.uba.ar (cactus.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.108]) by cactus.fi.uba.ar (8.11.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8DGoAv81881; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:50:10 -0300 (ART) (envelope-from fgleiser@cactus.fi.uba.ar) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:50:10 -0300 (ART) From: Fernando Gleiser To: Wayne Cuddy Cc: Subject: Re: Fuser replacement in FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20010913103353.A2701@crb-web.com> Message-ID: <20010913134540.D81150-100000@cactus.fi.uba.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Wayne Cuddy wrote: > I don't think so. The fstat system call does not perform the functionality of > Linux 'fuser'. Right, the fstat(2) syscall doesn't but the fstat(1) *command* does. Look at the numbers between the parens =0) Fer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message