From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 26 23:29:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083486FD for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:29:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01221688 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r5QNTcSj094257; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:29:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r5QNTcZI094254; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:29:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:29:38 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: Handbook obsolescence scan: "The vinum Volume Manager" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:29:39 -0600 (MDT) Cc: doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:29:41 -0000 On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Warren Block wrote: >> Moving it to an article should cover all the bases. It won't be first-line >> information in the Handbook, but can still be found. And eventually, if not >> already, we can have an archive section for obsolete information that may >> still be useful to someone, somewhere, but not most users. > > I find that articles are less often > - updated > - translated > > so I think that "downgrading" the content to an article is a good step > if we think the information is not useful in the general case. > > However, if the information is obsolete we already have > http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/ and it should be removed entirely. I kind of wish you had pointed that out earlier today, before I made an article version of the vinum chapter. It's ready to commit, but even easier to delete. Speaking of that link: can it be found on from http://www.freebsd.org/docs.html ?