From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 22:26:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E6316A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:26:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D6D43D4C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:26:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:26:10 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id C6CF35D08; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:26:09 -0700 (PDT) To: Dick Davies In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Jun 2005 23:20:41 BST." <20050606222041.GF9647@eris.tenfour> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:26:09 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20050606222609.C6CF35D08@ptavv.es.net> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Users Subject: Re: What to use to get remote display from a amd64 machine? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:26:10 -0000 > Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:20:41 +0100 > From: Dick Davies > > * Kevin Oberman [0616 23:16]: > > > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:11:14 +0200 > > > From: Claus Guttesen > > > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > > > > > What are people using for remote X displays on amd64 machines? > > > > > > What about 'ssh -X remote-machine'? > > > > 'ssh -Y remote-machine' is more likely to be useful on more recent > > versions of ssh. > > Not if you're sshing into a multi-user machine, unless I've misunderstood > what '-Y' does. You understand fairly correctly. If the remote system is multi-user and all users are not trusted (by you, personally and by others if it is work related), -X should be used. The problem is that most X apps won't run with -X. :-( Even a simple xclock would not work for me. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634