From owner-cvs-etc Thu Apr 16 16:14:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA08637 for cvs-etc-outgoing; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 16:14:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-etc) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.125.27.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA07530; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 23:10:34 GMT (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA07105; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 03:10:22 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Message-ID: <19980417031022.02794@nagual.pp.ru> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 03:10:22 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= To: Satoshi Asami Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc make.conf Mail-Followup-To: Satoshi Asami , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG References: <199804160801.BAA06806@freefall.freebsd.org> <199804162246.PAA10665@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <199804162246.PAA10665@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Apr 16, 1998 at 03:46:33PM -0700 Organization: Biomechanoid Sender: owner-cvs-etc@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, Apr 16, 1998 at 03:46:33PM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > (1) There is no description of MOTIF_STATIC. People will most likely > misunderstand the one above ("If you have Motif...") to mean both > lines and end up linking everything with libXm.a. Please add proper description in good English, I am not able to do it. > (2) The MOTIFLIB description is not appropriate anymore, now that > MOTIF_STATIC is given as an example here. It should be changed too, I agree. > MOTIF_STATIC was never intended for use by ordinary users. It is only > used for package-builders. Do we add every possible variable in > make.conf (if so, I have a few dozen more from bsd.port.mk) or only > have the common cases in here? I think system should be comfortable for developers first and next for ordinary users. > Maybe it's time for /etc/make.conf.ports? (No I'm not kidding.) Yes, good idea. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y