Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 17:10:17 +0100 From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@corecode.ath.cx> To: Ulrich Spoerlein <q@uni.de> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/47257: [update port] irc/ezbounce Message-ID: <20030120171017.013346b9.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <200301201501.h0KF18Ko079987@coyote.dnsalias.net> References: <200301201501.h0KF18Ko079987@coyote.dnsalias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=.oj37Tkqw)9EH+m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lately Ulrich Spoerlein told: > +.if defined(WITH_SSL) > +USE_OPENSSL= YES > +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-ssl > +PLIST_SUB+= SSL="" > +.else > +PLIST_SUB+= SSL="@comment " > +.endif how about defaulting to SSL? this is a generic question, not only specific to this port. i'd vote for default-ssl and default-ipv6 because both are well supported in the base system. porters, portmgr, comments? cheers simon -- /"\ http://corecode.ath.cx/#donate \ / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign / \ Against HTML Mail and News --=.oj37Tkqw)9EH+m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+LB9tr5S+dk6z85oRAo8MAJ40r+BCwO7Z8r5X3HobPqDMAx2kJgCgt8u3 oOYRmqaH3uQGsnIR7sjUk/o= =VlXP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.oj37Tkqw)9EH+m-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030120171017.013346b9.corecode>