From owner-cvs-all Sun Oct 8 10:49:25 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE6637B66D; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 10:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e98HnJY03809; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 11:49:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA02665; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 11:49:19 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010081749.LAA02665@harmony.village.org> To: "Brian F. Feldman" Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT avail Cc: "Akinori MUSHA" , alex@big.endian.de, asami@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 08 Oct 2000 13:45:47 EDT." <200010081745.e98Hjm512990@green.dyndns.org> References: <200010081745.e98Hjm512990@green.dyndns.org> Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2000 11:49:18 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200010081745.e98Hjm512990@green.dyndns.org> "Brian F. Feldman" writes: : everything is repo-copied, what is the reason that we should still keep the : old junk from the old ports format? I can understand if it's to sort out : any issues in the near future... cvs update can tolerate files going awol, but not directories. We must weigh the cost of the still slow cvs update against the cost of telling people how to fix things in their ports tree once the old dirs go away. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message