From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 15 18:17:32 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA23860 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 18:17:32 -0700 Received: from estienne.cs.berkeley.edu (estienne.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.42.147]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA23854 for ; Mon, 15 May 1995 18:17:31 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estienne.cs.berkeley.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA14306; Mon, 15 May 1995 18:17:17 -0700 Message-Id: <199505160117.SAA14306@estienne.cs.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: estienne.cs.berkeley.edu: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Tom Samplonius cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Adaptec 2940? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 May 1995 16:43:31 PDT." Date: Mon, 15 May 1995 18:17:16 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Is it just me, or is the 2940 slower than the 1742 and 2742? > > (BTW, I'm running a kernel supped last week) > >Tom I'll let you know once I get my Pentium machine. :) I don't see any reason why it would be slower than a 2742. -- Justin T. Gibbs ============================================== TCS Instructional Group - Programmer/Analyst 1 Cory | Po | Danube | Volga | Parker | Torus ==============================================