From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 22:26:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF18E16A4CE for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:26:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAE743D5A for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:26:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i7RMNBGH073499 for net@freebsd.org.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:23:11 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i7RMM8Cj073427; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:22:08 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <412FB259.5000200@cronyx.ru> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:14:49 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru-RU; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030426 X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Oppermann References: <20040827200532.GE22253@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <412F94BC.6360DC17@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <412F94BC.6360DC17@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: proposed new if_data variable X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:26:13 -0000 Andre Oppermann: >Brooks Davis wrote: > > >>I'd like to proposed adding a new variable, ifi_epoch, to struct >>if_data. It will be set to the time the counters were zeroed, >>currently, the time if_attach was called. The intent is to provide a >>correct value for RFC2233's ifCounterDiscontinuityTime and to make it >>easier for applications to verify that the interface they are looking at >>is the same one that had this index last time. >> >>Since this will increase the size of struct if_data and thus struct >>ifnet, the change needs to be made now if it's going to be made for >>5-STABLE. Any comments on this idea? >> >> > >I'm all for it! Very useful. > This could be other reason to bump version ... rik > > >