From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 23 09:09:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A14ABCF; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.peterschmitt.fr (smtp.peterschmitt.fr [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:72c8:4224::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF60A7CC; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.83] (unknown [82.226.113.5]) by smtp.peterschmitt.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8764020534; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:09:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <542138B9.3060600@peterschmitt.fr> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:09:13 +0200 From: Florent Peterschmitt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michelle Sullivan Subject: Re: pkg 1.3.8 requested but not available? References: <20140923083359.GA20383@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <54213713.7020200@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <54213713.7020200@sorbs.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcUuCwhc1mkWxjT1tLs7tBgJAUgPfvA7O" Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:09:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --HcUuCwhc1mkWxjT1tLs7tBgJAUgPfvA7O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 23/09/2014 11:02, Michelle Sullivan a =E9crit : > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> [...] >> You are using portupgrade so first upgrade pkg with portupgrade >> >> =20 >=20 > Just a thought here - why (like .rpm and .deb - and the reason I hate > them so much) are you making the package manager version a dependency o= f > a package? I can understand if there are new features that you may nee= d > to use a later version to get those features, but making a package > dependent on the package manager rather than displaying a warning that = a > feature is missing is the brain dead way that plagues upgrades for > redhat and debian. Of course if your intent is to make FreeBSD into > another Linux distro just with a different kernel, continue. >=20 What is the problem of upgrading the package manager first and then upgrade the rest of the world without any problem? --HcUuCwhc1mkWxjT1tLs7tBgJAUgPfvA7O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUITi5AAoJEFr01BkajbiB+EUP/2lUsEn9NGuQH9PtmVN6SZLX v18urrZi5ExHYQ+PqUvTsNul35z02ri9X/OBuNhjJrdfMPmm+RRuD3RuseE0+Pj1 OEPT5UHPRHhfoIVAetu8Qnpc95rzlr8TI6GfrHwj6VlWkOJNX8sog+yklWDXIY2g nh/rfUKOI5+753Cht9ghNm7qlBlSVF5W2F45gkNMKzaUh0GrFBt/HbQGoATK0OA7 vMQyCwdcCLp+ld0X09VBwFvK60XL2b/Nvei/rQFAixM+1VgdLNxzInb7hy9cs4B9 B+xqbTpvEXjH69r5nxV5VHbmFMoWfBO4/anwdDcT9MObWB28qoW/fyMQreNUcMot LIFpADQ2rgvKeCa/blf6jgfD/dUq5GjiBB1Dz6NcqZ8pHqMoTrKLeRlRgHQ6noG9 30l3xFOiCEzf1HfpNo5QcE19ZIEHvGb0Zm5bLIeEFsst+s19c8M6WoijJVy7MAwr A12xIBiE8Sd/q2JIed+awiD0kuReqFx2rD0wBlU975FZqZfcWX71HDNTfZjOmktW pNSvhNmpTeD8lssa38Qj+l81knhA3kHPt6YzsEcB1pAtFK6dHghSWex/7oFxuAWO Aoj3xd7vgyfO7V/kcuXqBydWA0jvHdGtpA+cTylFY+NlB1kzbgbtZZNUrkoMH5Nj 4XPjgaaZ2nv/KKAZHxNl =BoMt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcUuCwhc1mkWxjT1tLs7tBgJAUgPfvA7O--